RE: [Boost-testing] Re: [wave] Tru64 failures hopefully fixed.

From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-17 03:34:51

Markus Schöpflin wrote:

> You mean Tru64/cxx as opposed to Tru64/g++? 

Yes, sorry.

> I wouldn't be too 
> sure that it really worked, because of the error that was 
> present in process_jam_log which lead to erroneous success 
> reports. I have been digging around a little but so far I 
> didn't find anything promising.
> 
> BTW, is wave using static local variables in templates which 
> get instantiated implicitely? If yes, that could be a reason 
> because the compiler will generate multiple instances of such 
> a variable, one for each instantiation.

Yes there are static class members. I've removed the local static variables
already. Let's wait what happens ;-)

Regards Hartmut