Boost Testing :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-04 04:38:08

Next message: John Maddock: "Re: [Boost-testing] [Type Traits] AIX 5.1/vacpp6: is_enum fails to compile (Was: documentation on performing regression tests ?)"
Previous message: Aleksey Gurtovoy: "[Boost-testing] [Type Traits] AIX 5.1/vacpp6: is_enum fails to compile (Was: documentation on performing regression tests ?)"
In reply to: Jonathan Turkanis: "[Boost-testing] [iostreams] expected failures not marked as such"
Next in thread: Jonathan Turkanis: "[Boost-testing] Re: [iostreams] expected failures not marked as such"
Reply: Jonathan Turkanis: "[Boost-testing] Re: [iostreams] expected failures not marked as such"

Jonathan Turkanis writes:
> The regression reports are showing all iostreams failures in yellow,
> although most of the are marked as expected.

Doesn't seem to be the case at the moment. In general, in 99% markup
is not being applied because somebody has broken
"explicit_failures_markup.xml".

--
Aleksey Gurtovoy
MetaCommunications Engineering

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-testing list run by mbergal at meta-comm.com