Re: [Boost-testing] Toolset naming and regressions

From: Caleb Epstein (caleb.epstein_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-06 12:31:15

Would this change be acceptable to the Those Who Own the Tests and the
Release Coordinator?  I'm hesitant to commit it w/o asking first.  I
think this platform is worthy of inclusion in 1.33.

Index: explicit-failures-markup.xml 
=================================================================== 
RCS file: /cvsroot/boost/boost/status/explicit-failures-markup.xml,v 
retrieving revision 1.247 
diff -u -b -u -p -r1.247 explicit-failures-markup.xml 
--- explicit-failures-markup.xml        4 Jun 2005 06:10:24 -0000       1.247 
+++ explicit-failures-markup.xml        6 Jun 2005 17:05:34 -0000 
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ 
     <mark-toolset name="gcc-3.4.3-linux" status="required"/> 
     <mark-toolset name="gcc-4.0.0-linux" status="required"/> 
     <mark-toolset name="gcc-3_3-darwin" status="required"/> 
+    <mark-toolset name="gcc-3_4_3-sunos" status="required"/> 
     <mark-toolset name="iw-7_1-vc6" status="required"/> 
     <mark-toolset name="iw-7_1-vc6-stlp-4_5_3" status="required"/> 
     <mark-toolset name="intel-win32-8_0" status="required"/> 

-- 
Caleb Epstein
caleb dot epstein at gmail dot com