Boost logo

Boost Testing :

From: Daniel James (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-09 09:27:10

Hubert Holin <Hubert.Holin <at>> writes:

> For gcc-windows things are not as clear, as apparently this is a
> 32 bits architecture and not a 64 bits one. There is the possibility
> that "long double" may actually be (slightly) bigger than "double" on
> that platform (I seem to remember things along that line when I worked
> on NT a great while back), and that we are falling into the same kind of
> trouble.

'gcc-windows' is actually cygwin, which doesn't have long double functions.
It looks like mingw works fine.


Boost-testing list run by mbergal at