Boost Testing :
From: Martin Wille (mw8329_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-22 10:01:31
Doug Gregor wrote:
> On Jun 21, 2005, at 3:51 PM, Martin Wille wrote:
>>Doug Gregor wrote:
>>>Martin, if you'd like to drop support for GCC 2.95.3, go right ahead.
>>>We definitely don't need more than one tester on it, because we're not
>>>sure how prevalent it is anymore, and you've mentioned that it sucks
>>>a lot of resources for you.
>>Yes, this improves things for me.
>>Will OSL also run gcc-2.95.3-stlport tests?
> We should be able to do that... could you post your gcc-2.95.3-stlport
> configuration? Then I'll take a shot at it today and see how it goes.
I'm not sure what you mean with "stlport configuration".
My gcc-2.95.3-stlport-4.5.2-linux-tools.jam file reads:
GCC_ROOT_DIRECTORY = /usr/local/gcc-2.95.3 ;
STLPORT_VERSION = 4.5.3 ;
STLPORT_VERSIONS = ;
STLPORT_4.5.3_PATH = $(GCC_ROOT_DIRECTORY)/stlport-4.5.3 ;
STLPORT_INCLUDE_DIRECTORY = include/stlport ;
STLPORT_LIB_DIRECTORY = lib ;
SPIRIT_ROOT = /boost/head-regression/spirit-only-1.6.1 ;
include $(BOOST_ROOT)/tools/build/v1/gcc-stlport-tools.jam ;
(The SPIRIT_ROOT part doesn't work, apparently, although spirit is
installed in that directory.) However, I have doubts you meant that
file. I think there are better ways to write that, anyway.
The gcc-linux.mak file of STLport starts with:
CC = gcc
CXX = c++ -pthread -fexceptions
LIB_BASENAME = libstlport_gcc
I think those are the default values. I definitely didn't change
anything in the rest of that file.
stl_user_config has everything commented out. I think that is the
For building STLport I set up $PATH, $LD_LIBRARY_PATH and $LD_RUN_PATH
according to the gcc 2.95.3 installation.
I don't think there was more to configure.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com