Boost logo

Boost Testing :

From: Martin Wille (mw8329_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-22 10:01:31

Doug Gregor wrote:
> On Jun 21, 2005, at 3:51 PM, Martin Wille wrote:
>>Doug Gregor wrote:
>>>Martin, if you'd like to drop support for GCC 2.95.3, go right ahead.
>>>We definitely don't need more than one tester on it, because we're not
>>>sure how prevalent it is anymore, and you've mentioned that it sucks
>>>a lot of resources for you.
>>Yes, this improves things for me.
>>Will OSL also run gcc-2.95.3-stlport tests?
> We should be able to do that... could you post your gcc-2.95.3-stlport
> configuration? Then I'll take a shot at it today and see how it goes.

I'm not sure what you mean with "stlport configuration".

My gcc-2.95.3-stlport-4.5.2-linux-tools.jam file reads:

GCC_ROOT_DIRECTORY = /usr/local/gcc-2.95.3 ;

STLPORT_4.5.3_PATH = $(GCC_ROOT_DIRECTORY)/stlport-4.5.3 ;

SPIRIT_ROOT = /boost/head-regression/spirit-only-1.6.1 ;

include $(BOOST_ROOT)/tools/build/v1/gcc-stlport-tools.jam ;

(The SPIRIT_ROOT part doesn't work, apparently, although spirit is
installed in that directory.) However, I have doubts you meant that
file. I think there are better ways to write that, anyway.

The gcc-linux.mak file of STLport starts with:

CC = gcc
CXX = c++ -pthread -fexceptions
LIB_BASENAME = libstlport_gcc

I think those are the default values. I definitely didn't change
anything in the rest of that file.

stl_user_config has everything commented out. I think that is the
default, too.

For building STLport I set up $PATH, $LD_LIBRARY_PATH and $LD_RUN_PATH
according to the gcc 2.95.3 installation.

I don't think there was more to configure.

Send instant messages to your online friends

Boost-testing list run by mbergal at