Boost Testing :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-23 12:40:05

Next message: David Abrahams: "[Boost-testing] broken reporting of failure expectations"
Previous message: Toon Knapen: "[Boost-testing] compilation hangs on IBM/vacpp"
Next in thread: Aleksey Gurtovoy: "Re: [Boost-testing] Confusion about Borland test results"
Reply: Aleksey Gurtovoy: "Re: [Boost-testing] Confusion about Borland test results"

I'm trying to clean up some of the failures, and I'm seeing the
indirect_iter_member_types test fail with bcc-5.6.4 here. Why isn't
it showing up as a failure on the meta-comm results page?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

Next message: David Abrahams: "[Boost-testing] broken reporting of failure expectations"
Previous message: Toon Knapen: "[Boost-testing] compilation hangs on IBM/vacpp"
Next in thread: Aleksey Gurtovoy: "Re: [Boost-testing] Confusion about Borland test results"
Reply: Aleksey Gurtovoy: "Re: [Boost-testing] Confusion about Borland test results"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-testing list run by mbergal at meta-comm.com