Boost Testing :
From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-12 08:06:06
Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
> Markus Schöpflin writes:
>>how do I avoid that the boost source tree is removed and checked-out again
>>when running regression tests in non-incremental mode?
>>I had a look at the script and there is code for running "cvs up -PdA"
>>instead of "cvs co" when the source tree is already present, but currently
>>it is always removed by cleanup() which is in turn called by regression().
> Not always, only in the "full run" mode.
You're right, of course.
>>For me it would be very useful to not remove the whole source tree,
> Because of the bandwidth or something else?
Because of huge bandwidth savings and because it's faster.
>>but instead update it, even when running in non-incremental
>>mode. What do others think?
> We can definitely introduce another option for it.
That would be great.