|
Boost Testing : |
From: Victor A. Wagner Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-11 20:19:20
At 17:46 2005-08-11, you wrote:
>Carl Daniel wrote:
> > My latest VC8_weekly regression run still shows multiple failures for the
> > serialization library. Looking into the details, all of the
> > test_class_info_load_* tests fail, while all of the test_class_info_save_*
> > tests pass. Looking at the source code for the load tests, it looks as
> > though there's a dependency in the load tests on having already
> executed the
> > save tests, but when executed in alphabetical order (which seems to be the
> > default), the load tests are executed first, thus guaranteeing
> that the load
> > tests will never pass.
> >
> > Am I missing something obvious?
>
>No. It's been discussed before.
ok, where are we hiding the rc 133_0 results (some jerk posted a URL
in IRC that crashed my browser). There doesn't appear to be a link
from boost.org to the current regression test results
>--
>-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
>-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
>-- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com
>-- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - Grafik/jabber.org
>_______________________________________________
>Boost-Testing mailing list
>Boost-Testing_at_[hidden]
>http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-testing
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
"There oughta be a law"