Re: [Boost-testing] RudbekAssociates tests broken?

From: Doug Gregor (dgregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-06 09:55:52

On Sep 6, 2005, at 9:37 AM, Rene Rivera wrote:

> John Maddock wrote:
>>> Does that mean that 1.33.1 will produce compiled libraries with
>>> exactly the same name as 1.33.0?  That usually implies binary
>>> compatibility, which we have *never* attempted.
>>
>> I must admit I was just starting to wonder about that myself, I 
>> suspect we
>> have a problem here?
>
> Given recent discussions I'm worried also. Should we change things to
> include the full version?

IMHO, yes.

        Doug