Boost Testing :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Caleb Epstein (caleb.epstein_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-28 09:20:46

Next message: Martin Wille: "Re: [Boost-testing] [boost] Are we seriously planning to release 1.33.1 in a few days?"
Previous message: Vladimir Prus: "[Boost-testing] Dijkstra performance (Was: [Martin Wille] gcc-3.4.4-linux tests not being rerun?)"
Next in thread: Martin Wille: "Re: [Boost-testing] [boost] Are we seriously planning to release 1.33.1 in a few days?"
Reply: Martin Wille: "Re: [Boost-testing] [boost] Are we seriously planning to release 1.33.1 in a few days?"

On 9/27/05, David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:

Can we get rid of those in time? Is it working to alert developers to
> regressions in their libraries?

Should the testers be running RC_1_33_0 or HEAD? I've been running HEAD
since the 1.33 release...

--
Caleb Epstein
caleb dot epstein at gmail dot com

text/html attachment: attachment

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-testing list run by mbergal at meta-comm.com