Re: [Boost-testing] [iostreams][iterator] is_incrementable brokenon gcc 4.0.2

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-11 22:06:03

"Jonathan Turkanis" <technews_at_[hidden]> writes:

> David Abrahams wrote:
>> "Jonathan Turkanis" <technews_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
>> I also checked in a workaround to the main trunk of
>> boost/iostreams/detail/bool_trait_def.hpp, which you might want to
>> apply to the RC.  Note that the explicit qualification I added there
>> is probably the right thing to do regardless of the need for a
>> workaround.
>
> Thanks. I already checked in basically the same workaround on the RC_1_33_0
> branch; the only difference is I applied the workaround to all compilers except
> Borland.

Qualification _hurts_ Borland?  That's a first!

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com