Re: [Boost-testing] [QNX6] [config] Status report - comments please

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-05 07:35:21

"John Maddock" <john_at_[hidden]> writes:

>> It's pretty enough for me... but should that rather be applied in
>> boost/python/type_id.hpp ?
>
> I hadn't spotted that, yes it should, in fact the check for gcc in 
> type_id.cpp seems superfluous, as long as BOOST_PYTHON_HAVE_GCC_CP_DEMANGLE 
> gets reliably set in one location you should be OK.

But Jim's patch seems to indicate there are times when the cxxabi.h
header is unavailable, yet all the demangling functionality is still
there.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com