Re: [Boost-testing] Metacomm Borland test results out of date?

From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-17 07:05:57

John Maddock writes:
> I'm confused because this failure: 
> http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-HEAD/developer/output/metacomm-bin-boost-status-math_info-test-borland-5_6_4-debug_release.html 
> was fixed in cvs a couple of weeks ago, and passes just fine on my machine. 
> There are similar failures in the Math lib that were similarly fixed (it's a 
> trivial change to the Jamfile to statically link the runtime in those tests) 
> but which are still showing up as failures in the test matrix.
>
> Any ideas?

Looking at the fix, does the following pattern actually match our
toolset name (borland-5_6_4) as well?

   run math_info.cpp <template>config_options : : : <borland><*><runtime-link>static ;
                                                    ^^^^^^^^^
-- 
Aleksey Gurtovoy
MetaCommunications Engineering