Re: [Boost-testing] Metacomm Borland test results out of date?

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-19 13:39:43

"John Maddock" <john_at_[hidden]> writes:

>> Looking at the fix, does the following pattern actually match our
>> toolset name (borland-5_6_4) as well?
>>
>>   run math_info.cpp <template>config_options : : :
>>
>> <borland><*><runtime-link>static ; ^^^^^^^^^
>
> Oh shucks, I forgot I needed to add a separate line for every Borland 
> toolset version :-(

You don't. Look for the special-requirements rule in several of the
libs/test/Jamfiles, e.g. the one for multi_index.  You can follow that
example.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com