Boost logo

Boost Testing :

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-22 02:36:39


Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:

> Vladimir Prus writes:
>> I think that the best thing now is to gradually move regular regression
>> tests to V2. In my opinion, the ideal process will looks like this:
>>
>> - One regression runner switches to V2
>> - Next day I look at all test failures and classify them as "V2 bug",
>> "library bug", or "unclear". I'll work with library authors to
>> resolve bugs from the third category and will fix the V2 bugs.
>> - Another regression runner switches to V2
>
> Sounds reasonable. One thing I'd like to emphasise is that for the
> reports to be meaningful we should be able to keep versioned toolset
> names, at least in the resulting XML.

Sure, V2 configuration for regression runners will include version number
for toolsets.

- Volodya


Boost-testing list run by mbergal at meta-comm.com