Boost logo

Boost Testing :

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-15 09:57:37

David Abrahams wrote:

> Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> David Abrahams wrote:
>>> Doug and Volodya: and
>>> seem to indicate that the Python libraries
>>> aren't in the regular paths. Is that correct? In principle that
>>> should be okay; it's an indication that BBv2 isn't correctly
>>> propagating all the library's usage requirements to the executable.
>>> But your runs with earlier GCC versions are all working, which seems
>>> to indicate some other kind of problem. I'm without a clue here.
>> Doug, can you do the following:
>> 1. Do to libs/python/test
>> 2. Run "bjam --v2 -n -a" > log
>> 3. Send the me 'log'.
>> I suspect those two failing tests are built in a bit different way
>> then other tests,
> They are.
>> and looking at the command lines is the easiest way to understand
>> this.
> I suggest that you again go back and look at what we're doing in the
> v1 Jamfile.

I did try, and completely failed due to lack of any comments in V1 file. In
particular, I could not understand how the library paths is set on OSX, and
whether it's set at all?

Oh, I guess I can trick Boost.Build into believing we're on OSX, and then
see what command lines are produced.

- Volodya


Boost-testing list run by mbergal at