|
|
Boost Testing : |
From: Boris Gubenko (Boris.Gubenko_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-09 14:43:08
From: Thomas Witt <witt_at_[hidden]>
>>> Let me clarify this. I am perfectly willing to accept acc patches
>>> for 1.34. That is as long they don't break anything else.
>>>
I just posted HP-UX-specific patch for filesystem library on the
developers list:
<http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2006/06/106125.php>
>
> I think the easiest way for now is to post a message on the
> developers
> list with the respective library in the subject so that the library
> authors can take care of this.
Will do.
Thanks,
Boris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Witt" <witt_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost-testing_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Boost-testing] Missing toolsets from 1.33.1 to 1.34
>
> Boris,
>
> Boris Gubenko wrote:
>> From: Thomas Witt <witt_at_[hidden]>
>>> Let me clarify this. I am perfectly willing to accept acc patches
>>> for 1.34. That is as long they don't break anything else.
>>>
>
>>
>> There are low-hanging fruits though: for example, date_time library
>> tests testfacet[_dll] fail on HP-UX for exactly same reason they fail
>> on Tru64: because of the bug in the Rogue Wave library. They are marked
>> as expected failures on Tru64 and should be marked as such on HP-UX as
>> well. I'd like to modify explicit-failures-markup.xml accordingly in
>> both CVS HEAD and RC, but I don't have write access to CVS. So, how do
>> I do it? Submit a patch for .xml file?
>
> I think the easiest way for now is to post a message on the developers
> list with the respective library in the subject so that the library
> authors can take care of this.
>
> Thanks
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Witt
> witt_at_[hidden]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-Testing mailing list
> Boost-Testing_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-testing
>
>