|
Boost Testing : |
From: Andreas Huber (ahd6974-spamgroupstrap_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-25 17:09:44
Bronek Kozicki wrote:
> (the latter one not visible yet - still being tested). Both are using
> stlport
> 5.0.2 instead of standard C++ library bundled with the compiler
> (Visual C++ or GCC). I will update toolsets names to make it visible
> in next run.
There seems to be something very odd with mingw/stlport. The linker
complains as if it wouldn't find just about any std lib class:
Since the other test runner on the same platform reports similar
results, this hints at toolset issue?
Regards,
-- Andreas Huber When replying by private email, please remove the words spam and trap from the address shown in the header.