Boost logo

Boost Testing :

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-26 06:50:13

Rene Rivera wrote:

> Andreas Huber wrote:
>> Bronek Kozicki wrote:
>>> (the latter one not visible yet - still being tested). Both are using
>>> stlport
>>> 5.0.2 instead of standard C++ library bundled with the compiler
>>> (Visual C++ or GCC). I will update toolsets names to make it visible
>>> in next run.
>> There seems to be something very odd with mingw/stlport. The linker
>> complains as if it wouldn't find just about any std lib class:
>> Since the other test runner on the same platform reports similar
>> results, this hints at toolset issue?
> Yes, it's a problem I introduced in trying to fix the STLport 5 support
> in BBv2. The problem is that STLport5 by default only comes in
> multi-thread versions. And it also guards against single-thread code
> linking with multi-thread STLport. Unfortunately BBv2 can't deal with
> the problem coherently at the moment. I'll get back to trying to find a
> solution tomorrow.

FWIW, I still don't know how V1 deals with this problem. Will it build
everything in MT mode, or something else?

- Volodya

Boost-testing list run by mbergal at