Boost Testing :
From: Joaquin M Lopez Munoz (joaquin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-15 16:01:12
Vladimir Prus <ghost <at> cs.msu.su> writes:
> "JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z" wrote:
> > Shouldn't we then extend the <link>static requirement to
> > also cover this case? I don't know whether the following
> > would do (are wildcards supported in this context?):
> > <toolset>msvc-6.5*:<link>static
> > or else we need an extra requirement or a smarter
> > construct.
> The above won't work, so you either need a separate requirements
> for msvc-6.5 with stlport4 or employ "conditional requirements"
I've got that far as finding out about conditional
requirements, but then got stuck at the following:
and kept waiting for some advice here --most likely from you :)
> Using a second requirement for stlport might be easier
> and more direct solution.
You mean inserting an additional line like this?
The problem with that is that "msvc-6.5_stlport4" is AFAIK
just a convenient name chosen by Roland, so relying on it
feels like a hack. Doesn't BBv2 provide any other means
to check whether STLport is being used other than
guessing from the toolset name?
> Are you in position to try it yourself or want Roland and me to
> do this?
I don't have the proper environment to check this
out before commiting, so I'd rather some of you took
care of it.
JoaquÃn M LÃ³pez MuÃ±oz
TelefÃ³nica, InvestigaciÃ³n y Desarrollo