Boost Testing :
From: Martin Wille (mw8329_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-29 03:41:40
David Abrahams wrote:
> Martin, regardless of your discomfort, could we please follow my
> amended version of Nicola's suggested procedure, detailed below?
The results of our session:
Short version: the modification to how the tests get invoked produced
the desired result.
1. I peeked into the test_log.xml file for the 'extract' test for
gcc-3.4.5. Everything looks fine there now!
2. For reasons I don't fully understand, there two several results
1. One in extract.test/gcc-3.4.5_linux/debug/python-2.4/test_log.xml
This is the one we want.
2. One in extract.test/gcc-3.4.5_linux/debug/test_log.xml
This is the wrong one. I had deleted old results for the Python
tests before the recent run. I think I failed to cycle the
bjam.log files before running the test. This would result in old
test_xml files being regenerated. I can't predict how the outcome
will look in the results table.
I'll fix that problem by deleting the python results another time.