Boost logo

Boost Testing :

From: Martin Wille (mw8329_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-29 03:41:40

David Abrahams wrote:

> Martin, regardless of your discomfort, could we please follow my
> amended version of Nicola's suggested procedure, detailed below?

The results of our session:

Short version: the modification to how the tests get invoked produced
the desired result.

Long version:

1. I peeked into the test_log.xml file for the 'extract' test for
gcc-3.4.5. Everything looks fine there now!

2. For reasons I don't fully understand, there two several results

    1. One in extract.test/gcc-3.4.5_linux/debug/python-2.4/test_log.xml
       This is the one we want.

    2. One in extract.test/gcc-3.4.5_linux/debug/test_log.xml
       This is the wrong one. I had deleted old results for the Python
       tests before the recent run. I think I failed to cycle the
       bjam.log files before running the test. This would result in old
       test_xml files being regenerated. I can't predict how the outcome
       will look in the results table.
       I'll fix that problem by deleting the python results another time.


Boost-testing list run by mbergal at