|
|
Boost Testing : |
From: Victor A. Wagner Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-18 21:02:51
At 04:06 2007-04-02, Roland Schwarz wrote:
>David Abrahams wrote:
> > on Wed Mar 28 2007, Thomas Witt <witt-AT-acm.org> wrote:
> >> To clarify I am talking about results for tests that no longer
> >> exist.
> >
> > Do you think they're still in the table because of incremental
> > testing? Martin tests incrementally but he doesn't have them AFAIK.
>
>It would be nice, if we had kind of "auto-fade-out" for test results,
>that are too old, similar to what was proposed sometimes for entire
>tests uploads.
I believe I suggested the aging fade-out, and it's implemented...on
the column headers (I'd envisioned fading the cells, but didn't
specify). At least we can see somewhat at a glance which results are
old. fading the rows could be useful, but the summary page
encompasses sometimes many tests only a few of which may have become
outdated. it _would_ certainly be an alert that something needs to be done.
>But of course this would require modification of the result page
>generation scripts. A resource which seemingly is not available
>currently.
>
>I wanted just to drop in my ideas, I am not sure if this really is
>the best that can be done about the these dangling tests.
>
>Roland
>
>_______________________________________________
>Boost-Testing mailing list
>Boost-Testing_at_[hidden]
>http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-testing
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
"There oughta be a law"