Boost Testing :
From: Martin Wille (mw8329_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-02 23:12:41
Eric Niebler wrote:
> Rene Rivera wrote:
>> Eric Niebler wrote:
>>> Douglas Gregor wrote:
>>>> test7: gcc-3.3.6_linux
>>> Huh, this test has been passing for ages and the code hasn't changed
>>> recently. Spurious failure?
>> Probably spurious. Marting has some random memory errors on the RAM of
>> those machines, as in a single bit gets flipped with a low probability.
> Then can I humbly suggest that Martin refrain from running any further
> tests on this machine until the memory problem is fixed? Wrong test
> results are worse then no results at all IMO, and will only slow us down.
That would mean I won't run any further tests on this machine at all, as
I'm not going to waste any money for a 6 years old box. I'm not sure
this is desired.
I don't think there'll be a significant slow-down, however.