Re: [Boost-testing] IBM tests

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-07-02 13:35:20

on Thu Jun 28 2007, Rene Rivera <grafikrobot-AT-gmail.com> wrote:

> Christopher Cambly wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 17:14 -0400, Christopher Cambly wrote:
>>>> I also was surprised that the RC_1_34_0 regression reports appeared
>>>> on 
>>>> <http://tinyurl.com/lawq3>but the CVS_HEAD results appeared on DART.
>>>>  I am 
>>>> reading though the archives to find out more information about DART. 
>>>> Do you have documentation we can read? 
>>> At the moment, the use of DART is only an experiment. You can ignore it,
>>> unless it's causing trouble for you.
>> 
>> No trouble, in fact it seems to have some interesting potential.  I do 
>> find it
>> a little difficult to extract the information that we are interested in in 
>> its current
>> state. (Sorry to offend anyone). 
>
> No offense to me... I also find it hard to read results in Dart.

A few days ago I spent a few hours with the Kitware guys explaining
why that is the case, and reviewing Boost's existing results
presentation.  Maybe it'll get better.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com
The Astoria Seminar ==> http://www.astoriaseminar.com