|
|
Boost Testing : |
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-02 17:39:01
Boris Gubenko wrote:
> Eric Niebler wrote:
>> Just run xpressive's "test_actions" test and send me a
>> backtrace of the crash.
>
> Full test run just completed and this test, as well as test_symbols,
> failed because of a missing header file:
> <boost/fusion/sequence/view/iterator_range/detail/value_at_impl.hpp>
>
> bash-2.03$ find . -name "*.xml" -exec grep -l value_at_impl.hpp {} \;
> ./test_actions.test/acc/debug/link-static/test_log.xml
> ./test_symbols.test/acc/debug/link-static/test_log.xml
> bash-2.03$
>
> This is a known issue and, I thought, it was fixed. In fact, the
> report dated Tue, 2 Oct 2007 03:32:23 +0000 has test_actions
> exiting with "memory access violation". boost-trunk.tar.bz2 is
> dated 08:36 Eastern time. I'm not sure what's going on with the
> tarball.
Well I'm certain about the contents of the tarball by now, since I went
through the pain of verifying the contents in the recent changes. But
just in case I just did...
===
-bash-3.00$ wget http://beta.boost.org/development/snapshot.php/trunk -O
boost-trunk-snapshot.tar.bz2
--17:31:46-- http://beta.boost.org/development/snapshot.php/trunk
=> `boost-trunk-snapshot.tar.bz2'
Resolving beta.boost.org... 129.79.245.252
Connecting to beta.boost.org|129.79.245.252|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: unspecified [application/x-bzip2]
17:33:35 (162.42 KB/s) - `boost-trunk-snapshot.tar.bz2' saved [17701793]
-bash-3.00$ tar jtf boost-trunk-snapshot.tar.bz2 | grep value_at_impl.hpp
boost-trunk-2007-10-02-17-31-46-EDT/boost/fusion/sequence/container/vector/detail/value_at_impl.hpp
boost-trunk-2007-10-02-17-31-46-EDT/boost/fusion/sequence/container/deque/detail/value_at_impl.hpp
boost-trunk-2007-10-02-17-31-46-EDT/boost/fusion/sequence/container/list/detail/value_at_impl.hpp
boost-trunk-2007-10-02-17-31-46-EDT/boost/fusion/sequence/adapted/boost_tuple/detail/value_at_impl.hpp
boost-trunk-2007-10-02-17-31-46-EDT/boost/fusion/sequence/adapted/struct/detail/value_at_impl.hpp
boost-trunk-2007-10-02-17-31-46-EDT/boost/fusion/sequence/adapted/std_pair/detail/value_at_impl.hpp
boost-trunk-2007-10-02-17-31-46-EDT/boost/fusion/sequence/adapted/mpl/detail/value_at_impl.hpp
boost-trunk-2007-10-02-17-31-46-EDT/boost/fusion/sequence/adapted/array/detail/value_at_impl.hpp
boost-trunk-2007-10-02-17-31-46-EDT/boost/fusion/sequence/view/zip_view/detail/value_at_impl.hpp
boost-trunk-2007-10-02-17-31-46-EDT/boost/fusion/sequence/view/transform_view/detail/value_at_impl.hpp
boost-trunk-2007-10-02-17-31-46-EDT/boost/fusion/sequence/view/iterator_range/detail/value_at_impl.hpp
boost-trunk-2007-10-02-17-31-46-EDT/libs/fusion/example/extension/detail/value_at_impl.hpp
===
So the problem has to be at the receiving end somehow. I also note that
the HP tests don't show the revision number so something isn't up to date.
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo