|
|
Boost Testing : |
From: K. Noel Belcourt (kbelco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-31 17:39:57
On Oct 29, 2007, at 6:09 PM, K. Noel Belcourt wrote:
>
> On Oct 23, 2007, at 9:02 AM, Rene Rivera wrote:
>
>> Markus Schöpflin wrote:
>>> Rene Rivera wrote:
>>>
>>>> Markus Schöpflin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Wouldn't it make sense to not run tests on the machine where the
>>>>> results
>>>>> are generated?
>>>> Sure, and I've even suggested it before. Do you have an extra
>>>> machine I
>>>> could have?
>>>
>>> Unfortunately not, but I received the impression that we have
>>> plenty of
>>> volunteers for running regression tests on the platforms you are
>>> testing.
>>> Am I wrong here?
>>
>> Well, if they are volunteers they haven't volunteered yet. I seem
>> to be
>> the only one testing gcc-4.2.x on Linux. If someone steps up to
>> reliably
>> test more variants of gcc on Linux, I'll gladly stop my testing.
>
> Hi Rene,
>
> I've got access to gcc-4.2.1 on Linux so, once I figure out why
> run.py doesn't work from behind our firewall, I'll start running
> gcc-4.2.1.
Hi Rene,
The gcc-4.2.1 tests on Linux just completed so this may be a
reasonable time to free up your machine for results processing and
stop running gcc-4.2.1 tests on it.
-- Noel