Re: [Boost-testing] process_jam_log fails with bad_alloc exception

From: Nicola Musatti (Nicola.Musatti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-07 01:52:07

Beman Dawes wrote:
[...]
>> In my opinion we should tackle this problem from two sides: trying to 
>> avoid such an unwieldy output from this test, but also ensuring that pjl 
>>   truncates overly long line to a reasonable size. I would venture that 
>> 10KB would be a reasonable size, given how certain compilers fully 
>> expand some template definitions.
> 
> Makes sense to me. Care to submit a process_jam_log.cpp patch?

I'm willing to take a look, but I can't promise when. Still, given that 
the original problem appears to be fixed, this seems to be somewhat less 
urgent.

Cheers,
Nicola
-- 
Nicola.Musatti <at> gmail <dot> com
Home: http://nicola.musatti.googlepages.com/home
Blog: http://wthwdik.wordpress.com/