Re: [Boost-testing] Substitute for compiler_status?

From: Nicola Musatti (Nicola.Musatti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-15 16:59:34

Robert Ramey wrote:
> Hmmm - I've been using library status - its in the same directory as 
> compiler status.  It works for me - but I haven't run any local tests in a 
> couple of weeks.

I haven't tried it yet, but I believe it should work; if I'm not 
mistaken compiler_status was broken by the recent clean up of the test 
setup, which did away with the tests that were run directly from the 
status directory and with the corresponding status directory under bin.v2.

Cheers,
Nicola
-- 
Nicola.Musatti <at> gmail <dot> com
Home: http://nicola.musatti.googlepages.com/home
Blog: http://wthwdik.wordpress.com/