Re: [Boost-testing] Sandia-darwin-intel and... Sandia-darwin-intel!

From: K. Noel Belcourt (kbelco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-02 17:30:30

Hi Genny,

On Sep 2, 2008, at 1:32 PM, Gennaro Prota wrote:

> K. Noel Belcourt wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 2, 2008, at 11:01 AM, Gennaro Prota wrote:

> Ah! :-) Thanks. Perhaps the top row names (or the toolset names)
> should be a tad standardized? I couldn't gather that it was gcc.

I'm open to suggestions on the naming conventions...

>>> <http://beta.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/ 
>>> dynamic_bitset.html>?

So this code on the release branch :

     return do_count(m_bits.begin(), num_blocks(), Block(0),  
static_cast<m*>(0));

seems to compile okay with intel.  Can we use something like this on  
the development branch to fix this problem?

-- Noel