Boost logo

Boost Testing :

Subject: Re: [Boost-testing] Useless failures reports/broken testers
From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-05 15:57:30

siliconman <siliconman <at>> writes:

> In article <gipjtd$j66$1 <at>>,
> Gennadiy Rozental <rogeeff <at>> wrote:
> > * siliconman (borland- 6.10.0)
> >
> > Reports failure in library build, but link to the library build output
> > shows success with wierd content:
> I can send you the bjam log if that will help you. You can email me
> directly. (Sorry for not answering sooner. I was away for the holidays)

I found an access to his compiler. Still no joy. I've made some fixes (checked
in last night), but I will need help to work around internal errors and other
issues this compiler has with using declarations.

It's a shame. We entered 2009 and closing in on new standard and still Borland
and Sun compilers are no better that they were 5 years ago.


Boost-testing list run by mbergal at