Re: [Boost-testing] pathscale 3.1 reporting problems?

Subject: Re: [Boost-testing] pathscale 3.1 reporting problems?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-24 15:41:44

AMDG

Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> Steven Watanabe <watanabesj <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>   
>> It appears to be a gcc 3.3 specific problem.
>>     
>
> What is pathscale then? Any chance to upgrade to later version of gcc?
>   

I'm going by the info provided.
QLogic PathScale(TM) Compiler Suite: Version 3.1 PathScale(TM) Compiler 
Suite: Version 3.1
Built on: 2007-10-31 19:11:13 -0700 Thread model: posix GNU gcc version 
3.3.1 (PathScale 3.1 driver)

Pathscale 3.2 seems to be okay, since it's using gcc 4.2.

> How ifdef check should look like?
>   

According to 14.2, using ::template is legal but not
required for non-dependent names, so you shouldn't
need a #ifdef.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe