Boost Testing :
Subject: Re: [Boost-testing] [Important!] Testers.. New version of bjam, action likely required..
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-04-05 17:16:27
On 4/5/2010 4:09 PM, Belcourt, Kenneth wrote:
> On Apr 5, 2010, at 2:31 PM, Belcourt, Kenneth wrote:
>> On Apr 5, 2010, at 2:29 PM, Belcourt, Kenneth wrote:
>>> On Apr 5, 2010, at 2:23 PM, Rene Rivera wrote:
>>>> I just put back the latest version of bjam, 3.1.18, used by the
>>>> regression testing. Because subversion is not entirely intelligent
>>>> it comes to doing a checkout of a new branch over an existing tree
>>>> will likely need to delete the "tools_bjam" directory for things to
> So I get the same error message about no boost-test lines encountered
> (see below). Looking in results/bjam.log I see loads of lines like this
> which clearly contain boost-test.
> boost-test(COMPILE_FAIL) "config/no_void_returns_fail" :
> boost-test(RUN) "config/no_void_returns_pass" :
> boost-test(COMPILE_FAIL) "config/no_wchar_t_fail" :
> boost-test(RUN) "config/no_wchar_t_pass" :
> and then the tests start running. So what I'm confused is which python
> file is emitting this message? I can't find where this message is coming
> *****Error - No "boost-test" lines encountered.
> Any idea who's generating this error?
> -- Noel
> Exception: Command sequence
> "/tmp/kbelco/boost/results" <"/tmp/kbelco/boost/results/bjam.log"']"
> failed with return code 256
It's not a Python script generating those, it's the process_jam_log.cpp
program. No idea why a change in the bjam version would cause it to
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail