Re: [Boost-testing] [Important!] Testers.. New version of bjam, action likely required..

Subject: Re: [Boost-testing] [Important!] Testers.. New version of bjam, action likely required..
From: Belcourt, Kenneth (kbelco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-04-05 17:21:04

On Apr 5, 2010, at 3:16 PM, Steven Watanabe wrote:

> AMDG
>
> Belcourt, Kenneth wrote:
>> So I get the same error message about no boost-test lines encountered
>> (see below).  Looking in results/bjam.log I see loads of lines like
>> this which clearly contain boost-test.
>>
>> boost-test(COMPILE_FAIL) "config/no_void_returns_fail" :
>> "libs/config/test/no_void_returns_fail.cpp"
>> boost-test(RUN) "config/no_void_returns_pass" :
>> "libs/config/test/no_void_returns_pass.cpp"
>> boost-test(COMPILE_FAIL) "config/no_wchar_t_fail" :
>> "libs/config/test/no_wchar_t_fail.cpp"
>> boost-test(RUN) "config/no_wchar_t_pass" :
>> "libs/config/test/no_wchar_t_pass.cpp"
>> ...patience...
>> ...patience...
>> ...patience...
>>
>> and then the tests start running.  So what I'm confused is which
>> python file is emitting this message?  I can't find where this  
>> message
>> is coming from.
>>
>> *****Error - No "boost-test" lines encountered.
>>
>> Any idea who's generating this error?
>
> I think it's process_jam_log.

Yup, my bad.  I was searching scripts, not cpp source.

Okay, I'll build a debug process_jam_log and run it through Totalview,  
see what happens.

Thanks.

-- Noel