Boost Testing :
Subject: Re: [Boost-testing] 'Fail' vs 'Broken'
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-06-25 11:12:43
On 6/24/2010 6:26 AM, Christopher Jefferson wrote:
> On the boost regression tester, how does it decide between displaying
> 'Fail' vs 'Broken'? Does 'Broken' just get displayed for one test
> I like to keep an eye on the testers I run (the minion- ones, I
> should add that information), but I often don't see things 'fail'
> which previously work.
> Would it be possible to make 'Broken' appear for long? I could run
> the tester less often. Or, am I misunderstanding when it gets
IIRC, broken is when the test used to pass in a previous release and it
no longer does. But.. this doesn't really work at the moment because
they way to get that information is to update the "previous release"
expected results. Which we haven't done in a long time. As it's a rather
painful, and a bit laborious, process. And I'm tempted to clear out the
current set of previous release results so that the broken status
doesn't show up.
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail