Re: [Boost-testing] Testing with a stable Clang

Subject: Re: [Boost-testing] Testing with a stable Clang
From: Bryce Lelbach (admin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-24 06:23:31

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I've just recently gotten clang from trunk to build a working Linux kernel
(boots, can do non-trivial things like self host clang/Linux/Boost). I have
boxes, but my school is currently having issues setting up my external IP. Once
those are resolved, I'd love to set up a build bot that continually rebuilds
and tests clang/Linux/Boost - if you guys would be interested in having that
box be part of the Boost test network, I'd love to participate.

On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 20:50:12 +0100
Daniel James <dnljms_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I'm just listing the test platforms for the release notes and I
> noticed that all the clang testers seem to be from subversion. Is that
> right? If Clang 2.8 is considered suitable for use with boost, I think
> it'd be useful if someone tested the release branch with it.
> 
> Daniel
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-Testing mailing list
> Boost-Testing_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-testing

> 



- -- 
Bryce Lelbach aka wash
http://groups.google.com/group/ariel_devel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkzECSMACgkQO/fqqIuE2t7juwCgsLERB8uoMDfnZYmHXDkn66uE
82IAnRIE6GXYH/+45yS9/2K7PraDYB7V
=fFFi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----