Re: [Boost-testing] Concurrent Boost Testing

Subject: Re: [Boost-testing] Concurrent Boost Testing
From: Belcourt, Kenneth (kbelco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-24 16:36:46

Hi Chris,

On Feb 24, 2011, at 1:56 PM, Christopher Cambly wrote:
> > That's too bad, it worked for us on AIX 5.3.  Are you using a vacpp
> > built bjam or a gcc bjam?
>
> vacpp built bjam.  I can try a gcc built one and see if the results  
> are any different.
>

Yeah, just curious.

> > I could be mistaken but I think we've dumped our AIX machines so I'm
> > no longer able to debug this for you.  I'll check around and see if
> > we've still got access to an AIX box.  I do wish you had mentioned
> > this a few years ago when I first did this work..
> >
> Here is an example using bimap -typeof test.  We are running the  
> test for bimap/typeof but the output has date_time:
>
So to be clear, the actual test log (bjam.log) is mixed up and it's  
not a problem that the log file is okay but process_jam_log is hosing  
the xml results generation?
> Test output: IBM_aix - bimap - typeof / vacpp
> Rev 69148 / Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:31:14 +0000
> Report Time: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:51:27 +0000
>
> Compile [2011-02-22 20:36:14 UTC]: fail
>
>    echo passed > "/nfs/sparky/home/montana/boost_NEW/boost-CVS/ 
> dev.aix/results/boost/bin.v2/libs/date_time/test/ 
> testdate_facet_new.test/vacpp/debug/testdate_facet_new.test"
>
> I can also try the -p0 option as well to see if that helps.
>

What OS is this on?  Any chance you can send me a full bjam.log off  
list?

-- Noel