Re: [Boost-testing] Result masking behaviour for libraries marked"unusable"

Subject: Re: [Boost-testing] Result masking behaviour for libraries marked"unusable"
From: Hubert Tong (hstong_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-02 10:12:22

Hi all,

We have a locally tested patch ready which shows the percentage passing for
libraries which are marked unusable and also the percentage failing for
other libraries.
My colleague will be sending it shortly.

-- Hubert Tong

Hubert S. K. Tong
IBM Canada Ltd.
8200 Warden Avenue
Markham, Ontario  L6G 1C7
Canada
E-mail: hstong_at_[hidden]

From:	"John Maddock" <john_at_[hidden]>
To:	"Running Boost regression tests"
            <boost-testing_at_[hidden]>,
Date:	22-08-2013 11:51 AM
Subject:	Re: [Boost-testing] Result masking behaviour for libraries
            marked"unusable"
Sent by:	"Boost-Testing" <boost-testing-bounces_at_[hidden]>

> I am running the AIX tester and have upgraded to version 12.1.0.4 of the
> IBM compiler.
> I believe that the current treatment of libraries marked unusable,
> especially when the tests are mostly passing, is unhelpful both for
myself
> and to the community.
> Since the results are masked out of the status page, how are people
> supposed to gauge for themselves whether or not the library is usable for
> them?
>
> For example, the geometry/extensions tests all pass on the test results
> for
> the AIX runner except for issues with buffer_inserter.hpp.
> If a user wanted to use geometry/extensions and did not have a need for
> the
> functionality tied to buffer_inserter.hpp, they are currently impeded
from
> finding the actual status.

I think it's a good point - as library authors we have no way of knowing
when a compiler will jump from "unsupportable" to "compliant" so showing
the
actual results would make sense.

John.

_______________________________________________
Boost-Testing mailing list
Boost-Testing_at_[hidden]
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-testing