|
|
Boost Testing : |
Subject: Re: [Boost-testing] [EXTERNAL] Re: Massive debug output in develop nightly testing
From: Belcourt, Kenneth (kbelco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-11-17 15:55:24
On Nov 14, 2014, at 11:02 AM, Belcourt, K. Noel <kbelco_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Nov 14, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Belcourt, Kenneth <kbelco_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 11, 2014, at 7:46 PM, Rene Rivera <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, it does look similar to output I saw. Didn't realize it would show up for others. But I don't know where it's coming from.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Belcourt, Kenneth <kbelco_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Here’s a snippet of output from the nightly testing process. I looks like someone’s dumping pointer addresses, or something, and an awful lot of them at that. Rene, could this be related to the new testing capabilities you’re standing up? Any ideas?
>>
>> Looks like it’s coming from this commit Beman made a hour or so ago:
>>
>> c41521ceadb
>>
>> He seems to have added an ostream overload that is getting picked up by the testing system.
>>
>> include/boost/endian/detail/cover_operators.hpp
>>
>> This one around line 100 in particular looks suspect:
>>
>> // Stream inserter
>> template <class charT, class traits>
>> friend std::basic_ostream<charT, traits>&
>> operator<<(std::basic_ostream<charT, traits>& os, const T& x)
>> {
>> return os << +x;
>> }
>>
>> Could this be it?
>>
>> I haven't been able to reproduce the problem for either Boost.Endian or Boost.Timer running on Linux with gcc 4.8.2.
>>
>> What platform and compiler are you seeing the problem with?
>
> Strangely, the problem is now gone. The nightly testing logs no longer show the problem. Sorry about the noise Beman, Rene, no idea where it came from or how it was fixed.
Okay, I found this problem. It seems to be associated with the line in PJL.
d00e6335 tools/regression/src/process_jam_log.cpp (Beman 2014-08-15 09:58:56 -0400 360) std::cout << "***" << sha << std::endl;
Beman, perhaps you could add a little context about what this is doing?
— Noel