Boost logo

Boost Testing :

Subject: Re: [Boost-testing] BenPope x86_64 runners + runner requirements
From: Niklas Angare (li51ckf02_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-03-21 08:37:48

"Raffi Enficiaud" <raffi.enficiaud_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Le 20/03/15 20:55, Rene Rivera a écrit :
>> So.. I'd rather see those results. For the basic reason that having some
>> information is better than having none and wasting work.

I agree with Rene that it's best if failures show quickly and clearly in the
results table.

> I haven't had a look to this machinery. But I was thinking of a
> requirement target that checks, in or in the /status jam files,
> that the requirements are met before proceeding further the tests.
> This would save 100% of everything, plus unclutter the dashboard from
> the noise generated by the runner setup time (+faster feedback for those
> people in their setup).

If the results file is still uploaded, as I think it should be, that would
turn those columns mostly white, right? In what way has the table been
uncluttered, then?


Niklas Angare

Boost-testing list run by mbergal at