Boost logo

Boost Testing :

Subject: Re: [Boost-testing] BenPope x86_64 runners + runner requirements
From: Raffi Enficiaud (raffi.enficiaud_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-03-22 05:08:12

Le 21/03/15 11:35, Ben Pope a écrit :
> On Saturday, March 21, 2015 10:42 AM, Ben Pope wrote:
>> On Saturday, March 21, 2015 12:00 AM, Raffi Enficiaud wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I would like to know if these runners are actually being able to compile
>>> anything (lack of cstddef).
>> Yeah, sorry about that, I'll look into it today.
> OK, it's working now. Also, for msan and tsan, I've set the rpath to
> use the sanitized libc++, which has reduced the number of warnings
> produced.
> I've just kicked off a full build.
> Ben

Thanks, the run has cycled and almost everything is green for this runner :)

I have

==9511==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks

Direct leak of 171 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
     #0 0x4c5695 in realloc
     #1 0x7f339dfc3682 in __cxa_demangle

SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 171 byte(s) leaked in 9 allocation(s).


Only for clang-linux-3.6~asan~c14_libc++. This would be a demangling
that should be freed:

Just wondering why this is not happening in other compiler versions of
this runner.

Is the memory leak detection active for all compilers?

Thanks for having fixed this,

Boost-testing list run by mbergal at