On Sep 3, 2009, at 8:51 AM, Beman Dawes wrote:

Thanks to Noel for appending "_gnu++0x" to the Sandia-gcc test names to indicate that the compiler is running with the option that enables C++0x features. For example, "gcc- 4.4.1_gnu++0x".

I find this really helpful, and hope that other testers will also indicate C++0x features are enabled if the compiler requires a specific option to enable them.

However, could we agree on a shorter naming convention? Screen width is scarce on the regression reporting pages. See http://beta.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/summary.html

Perhaps just "-0x" as in "
gcc- 4.4.1-0x"?

Sure, I'll make the changes.

By the way, I'll begin running the MPI tests for both trunk and release now that the reporting is working.  But I'll have to create a separate tester for each toolset since the MPI installation is toolset specific.

-- Noel