RE: [Boost-Users] Digest Number 81

From: Anthony Kolarik (a.kolarik_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-31 12:37:24

>    Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 20:22:32 -0500 (EST)
>    From: Jeremy Siek <jsiek_at_[hidden]>
> Subject: RE: RE: Dependencies for tokenizer?
> 
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Jeff Garland wrote:
> jeff>
> jeff> I'm sure there is.  It is a matter of getting the "25 lines of
> jeff> actual code"  (my guess) in those 47 headers that tokenizer
> jeff> really needs into a small header.  I'm sure with a small
> jeff> effort you could do it.  Perhaps you could even find a way to
> jeff> improve the overall design in the process.
> 
> Well, it could get a little messy. The iterator adaptors use 
> some stuff
> from the type_traits headers, which have lots of workarounds 
> for different
> compilers, etc., etc.
> 
> For a super simple C++ stringtok see the header
> 
> boost/pending/stringtok.hpp
> 
> It's not an official boost library, but you might find it fits
> your needs.
> 
> Cheers,
> Jeremy

Thank you for pointing out the pitfalls of reworking tokenizer and for
pointing out boost/pending/stringtok.hpp, it serves fine for my purposes.
 -- Tony K.