Re: [Boost-Users] modifed boost::stringtok

From: hicks (hicks_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-06 13:27:25

Hi

I believe boost::tokenizer (a template class) is a more almighty way to 
get tokens, but the time needed to
master it and the work required per instantiation are somewhat high 
compared with the
self contained boost::stringtok() (a template function).  

I don't know if this answers your question, but I hope it does.

Craig Hicks

Toon Knapen wrote:

>hicks wrote:
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>I have created a modifed version of boost::stringtok() (the template
>>function in boost\pending)
>>with the aim of proving a more convient programmer interface.
>>(It is called stringtok_2() below, but the interface is identical to
>>stringtok()).
>>
>
>probably I've missed something (though did a search on strtok on the 
>archives) but how would you position this in respect to the 
>boost::tokenizer lib ?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Info: <http://www.boost.org>
>Wiki: <http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl>
>Unsubscribe: <mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>
> 
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
>
>
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]