Boost logo

Boost Users :

From: Colin Fox (cfox_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-16 13:53:58

On Sat, 2002-02-16 at 10:50, Peter Dimov wrote:
> From: "Colin Fox" <cfox_at_[hidden]>
> > I got the CVS version of boost, which you suggested, and had my program
> > running all night last night. No problems so far. Perhaps this solves
> > it.
> Let's hope so. I presume you're on a multiprocessor? Could you please also
> try my latest attempt, that uses lwm_linux.hpp on linux instead of the
> generic lwm_pthreads.hpp? It's much faster than the pthreads version when
> there's no contention but there's no point being faster if it's incorrect.

Yes, I forgot to mention that - I'm developing on a dual processor box.

How do I try the latest attempt? Is that what's in CVS, or do I need
something else?

Speed will become important, because eventually this is going to have to
handle a fairly high thread & activity load. But I completely agree that
correctness comes first. :)

Colin Fox
CF Consulting Inc.

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at, kalb at, bjorn.karlsson at, gregod at, wekempf at