Re: boost::noncopyable usage question

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-05 17:08:57

"Mark Storer" <mstorer_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:E840F0B7E6189547BDB91DA8BF2228AB016253F7_at_csmail.cardiff.com...

> I'm guessing the author, Dave Abrahams, didn't think anyone was going to
> declare a noncopyable*, so decided to pass on that little bit of extra
> overhead involved in declaring a destructor virtual.  Or it could be a
> mistake.
>
> Dave has posted to this list at least once... So tell us, did you mean to
> leave it non-virtual?

Absolutely, totally.