Re: Re: boost.function with CW 8.2 on W2k

From: Bertolt Mildner (Bertolt.Mildner_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-10 07:29:59

[...]
> I have tried to make nonnull() inline and/or static but that didn't help. I think the root of the problem is that the address of nonnull() is taken.
> I wonder if it is really needed to return a real (member) function pointer or if it would be OK to just return (safe_bool)1 ?

Don't know if this is useful but at least it makes my compiler more happy ...

diff -r1.33 function_base.hpp
287,291c287
<     struct dummy {
<       void nonnull() {};
<     };
< 
<     typedef void (dummy::*safe_bool)();
---
>     typedef void (*safe_bool)();
295c291
<       { return (this->empty())? 0 : &dummy::nonnull; }
---
>       { return (this->empty())? 0 : (safe_bool)~0; }
298c294
<       { return (this->empty())? &dummy::nonnull : 0; }
---
>       { return (this->empty())? (safe_bool)~0 : 0; }
-- 
Free Crypto Token - FCT
www.FreeCryptoToken.org