Re: BGL and Intel v6 compiler?

From: Chris Russell (cdr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-13 22:00:23

I'm making solid progress since switching to the Intel 6.0 compiler. Thanks
Dave.

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Abrahams" <yg-boost-users_at_[hidden]>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lib.boost.user
Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2002 10:26 PM
Subject: Re: BGL and Intel v6 compiler?

It's got perfectly good support for partial specialization. In fact, at its
core, it's one of the most conforming C++ compilers going. The biggest
problem is that by default it's in a mode which emulates many of VC6's bugs.
You can turn those off, but you probably need STLPort since the VC6/7
standard libraries that Intel 6 uses depend on those bugs. I'm not an expert
in how to do that, so you'd have to ask someone else...

Regards,
Dave

--
-----------------------------------------------------------
           David Abrahams * Boost Consulting
dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
"Chris Russell" <cdr_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:ak71gj$hlj$1_at_main.gmane.org...
> Lack of partial template specialization and MSVC 6.0 "Internal Compiler
> Error" has me looking for alternatives. Specifically, I'm considering
moving
> some BGL-dependent code into a library and compiling it with the Intel
v6.0
> compiler for Windows which can produce object code and libraries that I
can
> link into a MSVC 6.0 project. Can anyone comment on the Intel compiler's
> support for partial specialization - I'm not finding much except number
> crunching benchmark comparisons.
>
> Thanks - Chris
>
>
>
>
>