|
Boost Users : |
From: dick.bridges_at_[hidden]
Date: 2002-09-26 16:16:01
<datapoints>
MSDN January 2002 contains only the 'old' level 1 definition.
Q113417 from that same source says the compiler generates the warning with
both the /Ze and /Za switches.
The 'online' MSDN contains only the level 3 definition.
You're running SP3 and I'm running SP5.
</datapoints>
THEREFORE:
#pragma warning(disable : 4097) // ;)
#include <boost/function.hpp>
#pragma warning(default : 4097)
Thanks for the input.
"Jim.Hyslop"
<jim.hyslop_at_leit To: "'Boost-Users_at_[hidden]'" <Boost-Users_at_[hidden]>
ch.com> cc:
Subject: RE: [Boost-Users] bind: I just keep trying...
09/26/2002 01:01
PM
Please respond
to Boost-Users
dick.bridges_at_[hidden] [mailto:dick.bridges_at_[hidden]] wrote:
> Well, that helped A LOT. The only warnings I get now are:
>
> <warnings>
> c:\boost\function.hpp(451) : warning C4097: typedef-name
> 'base_type' used
> as synonym for class-name
> 'function<R,T1,T2,T3,T4,T5,T6,T7,T8,T9,T10>::function1<R,T0,
> `template-parameter268',`template-parameter269',`template-para
> meter270'>'
> The warning level is 4: I'm paranoid. Can these safely be ignored?
According to the MSDN:
---------------- begin quote from MSDN -----------------------------
Compiler Warning (level 3) C4097
typedef-name 'identifier1' used as synonym for class-name 'identifier2'
A typedef name which names a class is itself a class name. However, only a
class declared without a tag can be named. In the following line of code
the
typedef name P is promoted to class name but Q is not.
typedef struct { int member; } P, Q;
Q remains a normal typedef name and a synonym for the class.
The following example causes this warning:
typedef struct _T
{
int i;
} T;
struct U : T
{
int j;
}; // warning
struct V : _T
{
int j;
}; // OK
------------------------ end quote from MSDN -------------------------
However, when I tried compiling the example, MSVC6 SP3 at warning level 4
was completely silent. So I'm really confused now - is it a problem or not?
My instinct says no, but I've been wrong before.
-- Jim Info: <http://www.boost.org> Wiki: <http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl> Unsubscribe: <mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net