RE: [Boost-Users] Re: boost vs. The Lawyers (non-technical)

From: Elliot Murphy (elliot.murphy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-10 21:10:54

That would be helpful. Some of my colleagues have had 
terribly frustrating experiences trying to get our lawyers to
approve the use of various boost libraries. The lawyers don't seem
to like the idea of going into every source file to read a license
agreement.

-elliot

-----Original Message-----
From: James Curran/MVP [mailto:jamescurran_at_[hidden]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 9:58 AM
To: boost-users_at_[hidden]
Subject: [Boost-Users] Re: boost vs. The Lawyers (non-technical)

"Douglas Gregor" <gregod_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:200210090000.23639.gregod_at_cs.rpi.edu...
> Each Boost library has its own license that _must_ meet those
requirements. Of
> course, that won't satisfy the lawyers, so you'll probably have to send
them
> the individual library licenses for approval.
>
> We really could do much better in this area: at the very least, we could
> provide a comprehensive list of the licenses for each library.

    Perhaps we should add to our "standard" a requirement that a printable
license page by included with each libraries' documentation (with one or
more "fill-in-the-blank" templates/samples available on www.boost.org)

--
Truth,
James Curran
www.NovelTheory.com  (Personal)
www.NJTheater.com   (Professional)
www.aurora-inc.com   (Day job)
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
Info: <http://www.boost.org>
Wiki: <http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.