|
Boost Users : |
From: Hickman, Greg (greg.hickman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-11-10 13:34:52
I'd like to prevent clients from directly creating and deleting instances of
a type like 'Bill' below, so Bill's constructor and destructor have been
made private to prevent ordinary client access. Since Bill has reference
semantics, construction is handled by a static 'Bill::create()' factory
method which returns a dynamically allocated Bill instance wrapped in a
shared_ptr. Destruction is handled by a private Bill::Deallocator who also
happens to be a Friend of Bill (FOB).
My question is: Is this an acceptable use of the shared_ptr deallocator, or
am I just asking for trouble?
Thanks,
Greg Hickman
//--------------------------------------
#include <boost/shared_ptr.hpp>
using namespace boost;
class Bill;
typedef shared_ptr<Bill> Bill_ptr;
class Bill {
private:
Bill() {}
~Bill() {}
struct Deallocator {
void operator() (Bill* b) const {
delete b;
}
};
friend struct Deallocator;
public:
static Bill_ptr create() {
return Bill_ptr(new Bill, Deallocator());
}
};
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net